Evaluating optimal quality assurance and quality control conditions of activation measurements at the accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy system employing a lithium target.

Evaluating neutron output is important to ensure proper dose delivery for patients in boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). It requires efficient quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) to maintain measurement accuracy. This study investigated the optimal measurement conditions for QA/QC of activation measurements using a high-purity germanium (HP-Ge) detector in an accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy (AB-BNCT) system employing a lithium target. The QA/QC uncertainty of the activation measurement was evaluated based on counts, reproducibility, and standard radiation source uncertainties. Measurements in a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cylindrical phantom using aluminum-manganese (Al-Mn) foils and aluminum-gold (Al-Au) foils and measurements in a water phantom using gold wire with and without cadmium cover were performed to determine the optimal measurement conditions. The QA/QC uncertainties of the activation measurements were 4.5% for Au and 4.6% for Mn. The optimum irradiation proton charge and measurement time were determined to be 36 C and 900 s for measurements in a PMMA cylindrical phantom, 7.0 C and 900 s for gold wire measurements in a water phantom, and 54 C and 900 s at 0-2.2 cm depth and 3,600 s at deeper depths for gold wire measurements with cadmium cover. Our results serve as a reference for determining measurement conditions when performing QA/QC of activation measurements using HP-Ge detectors at an AB-BNCT employing a lithium target.

Initial evaluation of accelerator-based neutron source system at the Shonan Kamakura General Hospital.

An accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy (AB-BNCT) system was installed at the Shonan Kamakura General Hospital (SKGH). We confirmed that a stable operation was possible for 1 h at a current of 30 mA. The evaluated thermal neutron flux was 2.8 × 109 cm-2 s-1 and in good agreement (±5%) with the calculated values. The daily variation was within ±2%. The ambient dose rate due to residual radioactivity after irradiation was approximately 5 µSv/h using a lead shutter.

Relative Biological Effectiveness Values of Spot-scanning Proton Beam Therapy at Shonan Kamakura General Hospital.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to confirm the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values of the proton beam therapy (PBT) system installed in Shonan Kamakura General Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clonogenic cell-survival assays were performed with a human salivary gland (HSG) cell line, a human tongue squamous-cell carcinoma cell line (SAS), and a human osteosarcoma cell line (MG-63). Cells were irradiated with proton beams and X-rays with different doses (1.8, 3.6, 5.5, and 7.3 Gy for proton beams, and 2, 4, 6, and 8 Gy for X-rays). Proton beam irradiation used spot-scanning methods and three different depths (at the proximal, center, and distal sides of the spread-out Bragg peak). RBE values were obtained from a comparison of the dose that resulted in a surviving fraction of 10% (D10). RESULTS: D10 of proton beams at the proximal, center, and distal sides and X-rays in HSG were 4.71, 4.71, 4.51, and 5.25 Gy, respectively; those in SAS were 5.08, 5.04, 5.01, and 5.59 Gy, respectively; and those in MG-63 were 5.36, 5.42, 5.12, and 6.06 Gy, respectively. The RBE10 values at the proximal, center, and distal sides in HSG were 1.11, 1.11, and 1.16 respectively; those in SAS were 1.10, 1.11, and 1.12, respectively; and those in MG-63 were 1.13, 1.12, and 1.18, respectively. CONCLUSION: RBE10 values of 1.10-1.18 were confirmed by in vitro experiments using the PBT system. These results are considered acceptable for clinical use in terms of therapeutic efficacy and safety.

Registration error of the liver CT using deformable image registration of MIM Maestro and Velocity AI.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the irradiated area and dose correctly is important for the reirradiation of organs that deform after irradiation, such as the liver. We investigated the spatial registration error using the deformable image registration (DIR) software products MIM Maestro (MIM) and Velocity AI (Velocity). METHODS: Image registration of pretreatment computed tomography (CT) and posttreatment CT was performed in 24 patients with liver tumors. All the patients received proton beam therapy, and the follow-up period was 4-14 (median: 10) months. We performed DIR of the pretreatment CT and compared it with that of the posttreatment CT by calculating the dislocation of metallic markers (implanted close to the tumors). RESULTS: The fiducial registration error was comparable in both products: 0.4-32.9 (9.3 ± 9.9) mm for MIM and 0.5-38.6 (11.0 ± 10.0) mm for Velocity, and correlated with the tumor diameter for MIM (r = 0.69, P = 0.002) and for Velocity (r = 0.68, P = 0.0003). Regarding the enhancement effect, the fiducial registration error was 1.0-24.9 (7.4 ± 7.7) mm for MIM and 0.3-29.6 (8.9 ± 7.2) mm for Velocity, which is shorter than that of plain CT (P = 0.04, for both). CONCLUSIONS: The DIR performance of both MIM and Velocity is comparable with regard to the liver. The fiducial registration error of DIR depends on the tumor diameter. Furthermore, contrast-enhanced CT improves the accuracy of both MIM and Velocity. INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL: H28-102; July 14, 2016 approved.